RAINDROPS ON ROSES AND WHISKERS ON KITTENS

I had another go at leaving a comment on the Daily Telegraph today. No problem at all. It must be me. For about a week now my comments have been refused. The other thing is, the Guardian has also been refusing my efforts.
Anyway, I saw a part of the BBC. TV. News, about the HoC. Select Committee questioning
Journalists about the reporting of the Banking fiasco and meltdown. And of course the journalists defence. As usual, the HoC., was trying to get the Journalists to accept blame for stirring the pot and frightening off the investers and the money, and destroying confidence in the financial markets in the City. One of the people being questioned was Robert Peston of the BBC.
A couple of years ago, I posted an article on the BBC. Actionnetwork about this very subject. Now, if you go to-: http://www.atflynn.co.uk you will find at the very bottom of the page a link to "Actionnetwork". There, when you scroll down, you will find an article Titled, The Golden Paradigm. This is the speach, by Lord Beswick in the HoL. in 1985, about Banking and the abuse of the money supply, debt and other bad habits of the Money Men. Oh Yes!! and the suggestion that we were on the road to ruin. And this is 1985. If you have a look through the content of some of that link, you will see that four and more years ago, myself and others were convinced we were heading for a brick wall. Next, anyday now, certainly by April, May, the European Union will collapse. The nonsense of the ECB. and other unaccountable "Committees" will create so much debt that the cost paid by the half a dozen members who actually fund the whole fraudulent circus will break another half-dozen Banks.
There is about four to six weeks to go before the big bang. Keep your head down.
Regards, to all, ATFlynn, "Norfolk's Mutineer"

REVISE THE GLORY OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS.

That does of course mean we restore the Hereditary Peers to their rightful place at the Top Table with the King and Queen. They are as Heralds of the Monarchy and Har

MY THANKS FOR THE COMMENT AND THE INFORMATION

I had intended to expand my comments of yesterday, but as the gay Gordon will tell you, events dear boy events. I have been hit by an overload of bad news.
My reaction is to hit back. I don't think it a good idea to sit back and let them, that rabble at Westminster, walk all over you and steal your money to pay off the failed "get rich quick" brigade in the City of London and elsewhere.
And then that bunch of ***(I just can't put words to thoughts, when those words are offensive even to myself.)
What with some of the actions that created this awful situation, the fraudulent stastics and, only yesterday, the very iffy inflation figures. Everything about Westminster and Whitehall is now so suspect you know without a second glance, "they are trying to *con* you again.
Well, I have a thought that might give you all a reason to sleep easier tonight. Why not use the good old "Human Rights" argument and promote the Sovereignty of the Poor Bleeding Taxpayer. Don't Taxpayers have Human Rights ???? Have they NO right to object to silly sods in Westminster and Whitehall, stealing their money and giving it away to those, who are too tired to get up in the morning ???
Enough for now, I'll get back to this tomorrow, Kind regards to one and all.
ATFlynn, "Norfolk's Mutineer"

WHAT NOW FOR THE GLOBAL ECONOMY ?

I turned on the television just before 0300hrs. this morning, and what did I see ? Barack Obama, walking down a stairway, now the President of The United States of America. There was a look on his face, that was a first as far as I know. At first I thought it was a mixture of pride and satisfaction. And that he deserves. But no, I believe what I saw was triumph. A very dangerous emotion.
It made me remember the BBC. statement that Obama had been able to amass a warchest of $5Billion, to fund his campaign. And it was also said, that the money was not donated in $5 and $10 contributions. This was serious money. So now today is the start of Payback Time. What are his first Meetins as President ? Exactly.
I think it is time that, "RESTORE THE REPUBLIC", began to think about changing their Washington Administration for a more local governance based on the individual States
and allowing Washington to look after Foreign Affairs. Enough of these multi Billion $Dollar hand-outs that somehow only ever grease the bottom half of the pole, preventing others from climbing out of the swamp.
Enough for now, time to watch the early morning Business News on BBC. TV.
Back later, Regards, ATFlynn, "Norfolk's Mutineer".

TIME WE CUT ADRIFT OUR TOXIC PAST.

And as we emerge the other side of yesterday, and into today having abandoned the baggage of Westminster and Whitehall, we are presented with the view of a clean bright future unsullied by the lowlife that now occupies the lower Chamber. I know, not all of the Members are wasters, just most of them.
The point is, what the bloody hell can you, we, us, do about it? Well, this is my answer.

The very first manoeuvre is to arrange for all employers and all employees to move their legal obligations for employment, Off-Shore and beyond the jurisdiction of the British Courts. There is no reason why any business, registered in Britain, cannot be changed into a holding Company. Allowing the Directors to engage an Agent based off-shore, to employ and pay, the workforce needed to fulfil the duties and functions the employment requires.
Don't worry, there is nothing to stop you doing what I suggest. Except you should ask some Accountancy Company or business. I believe I am right in saying that it would be illegal for any one of them to even say, that it is legal to avoid Taxation. And yet people do so every minute of the day.
To start with, I want to remove the whole of Norfolk, from the clutches of Westminster and Whitehall. For that reason today, I attempted to speak to Daniel Cox, Leader of Norfolk County Council. He is out of the office until Friday.
Last April, I attended a full Council meeting at South Norfolk District Council and put the case for the Taxpayers, to Legally remove their income from the Jurisdiction of Westminster and build an alternative system based on the Parish, Town and County Council. My efforts were received with applause. Since then I have spoken to, and met with Daniel Cox at least twice.
Daniel Cox is trying to prevent the re-organisation as ordered by Westminster, in favour of a single Unitary Council for all of Norfolk. This it is believed would allow for a reduction of some Hundreds of Millions of £Pounds each year in Taxation. But the powers that be, in Westminster wont hear of it. They object to the extent that Mr. Cox has been de-selected as a Conservative Councillor.

Another point I would high-light, is the fact that Norfolk, with a population just short of one million people, has to Elect Eight MPs. Electing Four MPs, is a bit strong and over the top don't you think ? And of course, each County must pay its own MPs. That is the only way you will ever get them to do your bidding. Remember, they are your servants not just Party members.
What is needed is for the Counties to exert the wishes of the People over and above the the Money Men, buying favours from the Political Parties.
Enough for now, time I was in bed. Kind Regards, ATFlynn, "Norfolk's Mutineer"

PAY BACK TIME. WAGE EARNERS AND TAXPAYERS FOOT THE BILL

I have spent the last two hours reading past comments and if you go
to-: www.atflynn.co.uk you can go back a little more than two years, on this site, and find comments relating to this melt-down. There are two other web-sites that also paid much attention to the problem. That is, The TaxPayers Alliance, and in its own way, The Daily Express. Both of these are still chasing the "Spivs" of Westminster and Whitehall. The problem is, whatever Party is in Power, the House of Commons will still carry on its merry way just like a drunk at a Christmas Party. They can't resist it.
Others did make reference to the problems. But I mean as a News Paper, the Express chased this problem for more than two years. Ever since the acrid smell of fraud wafted out of HM. Treasury with the news of the enormous number of PFI. contracts. I did manage to get a copy of the contract for the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. Last week Fraser Nelson and Peter Hoskin, published a two page article in the Spectator about PFI. "jobs". I would point out tho', that the 30 year duration they describe is in fact only the first part of the contract.
The building work required is first completed and the job handed over. Next, the first re-financing takes place and the annual "service charge" is agreed. The service charge is a yearly ground rent (as it was explained to me by the NHS Care Trust in Norwich.) This charge is up-dated every year, and the re-financing takes place every five years. So far the N.N.U.H. has had one re-finance and it cost the poor old Taxpayer another £116 Million £Pounds making the cost so far, £345 Million without the Ground Rent, and that is £37.6 Million for the year, 2003/4. And yes, at the end of the first 30/31 years, the contract is extended for another Thirty years and then it is open ended allowing for further periods of payment. Copies of the contract are available on request.
Oh! yes. In this contract time, until 2061, it is a safe bet the re-payment time will last far longer than the building itself, it is an abortion of a place. It even takes the security dept. ten minuts to get from their office to the end wall of the Hospital Building. And it covers a 63 acre site.
http://www.HM-Treasury.gov.uk/mediastore/otherfiles/greenbk_mottsrep02.pdf
*****************************************************
I did have an idea of how many of these contracts there were, but records were piling up and my wife had a moan about it, so last week I ditched a dustbin full of information to make room. For a moment I wished I hadn't.
Still, we can all see the problems the NU-Labour Party, NU Nonsense has now created. And if any of you think that Westminster and Whitehall are going to "fix" it, I have news for you.
How many of you remember Len Cook?? At the ONS?? Len-Cook the-Books. Since his time, not one piece of information from the ONS. is believable. Everything you are now told by this bunch of Baby snatchers and Pensions thieves, is suspect even if it is not an outright lie.
London, Westminster and Whitehall, are finished. Time now that you, the Poor Bloody Taxpayer, called an end to the nonsense that comes from Brussels. To start with, at a minimum you are paying £6 Billion a month to them. At the very least, £72 Billion a year. And then there is the "Customs and Excise", how many of you realise that every penny that is collected by customs duty, is turned over to Brussels and you poor old Taxpayers even have to pay the cost of collecting it. There are other payment that go straight to Brussels, like the "Carbon Transfer Tax", what, you didn't know you paid one??? On the hugh rise in your Electricity bill it still says you pay VAT. at 5%, well let me inform you, part of that cost-hike was another Tax imposed by Brussels. Do you know, at a guess, I would think that if you abandoned the European Union, you could save yourself at least £2 Billion of Taxation,
EACH BLOODY WEEK.
****************************************************

All that is needed is for all Employers to Employ all Staff, including yourself, from an Off-Shore location using an Agent based in that location. As long as you only remit your Tax Free allowance, and of course a similar allowance for any family members you are responsible for; All money NOT remitted is Tax Free and beyond the Jurisdiction of any British Court. That money can however, be accessed and used by any account holder, to pay bills or other charges, even standing orders, without becoming liable for Taxation. Even VAT. could be ignored before the first year of this system of Taxation is over. There will need to be Taxation to pay for all the necessary Public Services that are required. But believe me, once we get Taxation broken down to a County by County structure, and the Welfare State under controll, I will guarantee you will pay no more than 20 pence in the £Pound and it could be as low as 10 pence in the £Pound. One last thing. It would be illegal for any Elected Councillor to suggest this or be part of system of Tax Revenue Collection. But it is possible to ask the Elected Council to take charge of the Revenue and be responsible for the Administration of the Spending Policy. But the Taxpayer should always be in control of formulating and setting the Spending Policy.
I'll come back to this Policy Suggestion later.
Regards, ATFlynn, "Norfolk's Mutineer"

Tax Justice Network: Dr Doom and the offshore dictionary

Tax Justice Network: Dr Doom and the offshore dictionary