Friday 30 January 2009

REVISE THE GLORY OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS.

That does of course mean we restore the Hereditary Peers to their rightful place at the Top Table with the King and Queen. They are as Heralds of the Monarchy and Har

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The original post is mine. I have spent some time reading the bits and pieces for and against thr HOL. and I must say that most have a point of one sort or another. But where does the axe fall?
Please , "Think" about this for an answer:
Westminster and Whitehall have amassed many fortunes and many answers to questions of probity. Only now is the Honesty in doubt.
But could I put before the Taxpayers the possibility that any question of the honesty of Politicians and the Administration at Westminster allowes you thr Poor old Taxpayer, to choose the future route he is to take.
For believe me, it is now within your grasp, that is all of the Taxpayers of Britain, of Europe, and I believe, America, Canada and the old Empire Countries in other parts of the world. Tell me my dear Brove, Why the bloody hell should you silly buggers pay all this Taxation just to make a load of half-arsed Politicins look good.
Join me and give the silly buggers a good kick, "over the rainbow even". Enough for now.
Kind Regards, ATFlynn
"Norfolk's Mutineer"

Anonymous said...

The people of Britain have been robbed blind by the 'establishment' and that includes the Crown and those that like to call themselves lords.

Well, they are not my 'lords' ... and I believe many feel the same.

The British people have been robbed of their "Common land", which was stolen by the crown and given to their friends and partners in crime. They have been robbed of their "Common Law" that has been litigated out of existence, until we are no more than state/corporate slaves, and it seem we have also been robbed of our "Common Sense" if we go along with their plans.

With Common Land, there was no need for a welfare state. If someone hit hard times, he took his family and headed out to the nearest forest or patch of common land where he could subsist and rebuild his life.

With Common Law, there was no need for expensive solicitors, barristers and law lords. Problems were usually thrashed out by the community. Rough justice maybe, but people had more respect for each other and had to consider the consequences of their actions, even the rich.

Of course, this is another reason why the "Right-to-Bear Arms" was litigated out of existence during the 1920's. The 'government' didn't like the idea of people who could defend themselves from crooks.

In the vain hope that there remains a little "Common Sense" left in these Isles of Britain, I hope people are beginning to see the wood for the trees.

All the best,

PEACE AND POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

Anonymous said...

John Harris - 'It's an illusion' talk at the Stoke 'Lawful Rebellion' Conference

VIDEO: http://www.tpuc.org/node/558

Anyone interested in what is really going on should watch this video.

Also contact THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP and THE UK COLUMN